Blogs

Prison Cell

I am an “outskirts millennial” and used to think that people running around constantly on the phone must be really important, cool people. How I desired to be special! Beginning to watch “Homecoming” on Amazon Prime, triggered memories I had long forgotten. Oh how Julia Roberts character just craved to be part of something meaningful! Oh how the Colin character reminds me of the leader of my cult. He would call her constantly at work and at home, and while he was multitasking a birthday party of his kid, managed to smugly impose himself into her life, and finally tear her apart while he was at a dinner gathering.

How excited I was to get my first cell-phone contract set up when I started out as a student in a new city. Back then in 2005, they offered both a landline and a cell-phone number from one phone, that was cool. What freedom I had found! Now my mind wanders and imagines how the leaders could have never taken over my life like they did, had I not owned a cell. Owning a cell placed me in a prison.

While my starved for attention self enjoyed and welcomed frequent phone calls at first, I realized quickly that with a call or a text came an interference or a request. Whatever I had planned, had to be interrupted, and most often canceled, because via phone I would be informed about an upcoming trip to some special place, or town, or that I needed to show up at the leaders house asap. As a student, I had flexibility and time on my hands but this level of assumed consented spontaneity made a social life difficult. Not showing up was not an option.

At first, excitement and a sense of adventure made the interruptions to my day fun. Eventually, the men would go off on their own (women asked too many questions about what’s appropriate behavior and reported men’s behaviors back to the wives at home), leaving us damsels to ourselves. At times the leaders called to confide in me or ask for feedback but that changed after my first year with them.

With less phone contact came a new level of phone calls. Tormenting phone calls. Someone had passed on something I said or had done, or the leader had witnessed it himself, and I would get a personal admonishing phone call session, leaving my insides turned upside down wherever I had been naive enough to pick up the phone.

Like that one day I was going to see a professor about an exam, and while waiting in the hallway, I was called and told that on my sister’s wedding day there would be a mandatory seminar that I had to pay 100Euro for to attend. Of course I mentioned my sister’s wedding but the leader, busy and sweet, shrugged the wedding off saying, “I guess you won’t be able to go then.” My heart sunk so deep into my stomach, I had to compose myself before meeting the professor. Or that other time, awhile before this event, when I was visiting my sister who lived about 6 hours train ride away from me, and I was called late at night and told after I arrived to come right back the next day, even though I had planned a longer stay.

Or that day my fiancé and I went out looking for an engagement ring. The night before, we, like real adults, had been invited to dinner at the co-leaders house. The casual dinner conversation, in which I shared my dreams to do charitable work all over the world, came to haunt me as my comments apparently warranted an admonishment for not being focused on the town God had placed (imprisoned) me in. I still remember that moment, having stepped outside the jewelry store to pick up the phone feeling on top of the world and not expecting anything could change that, looking into my reflection of the store window. Gazing back from the laid-out jewelry to myself in the window reflection, I felt like a fool and a fake for the life I yearned to live for God was ironically out of reach because God said so. It broke me.

Now I know that all these moments (and so many more) were spiritual assaults. Their actions are the definition of unhealthy, intrusive, manipulative, controlling leadership. My freedom as a mere human being was taken away from me. My free time, my family, my future, and my identity were taken over. Rather than helping me discover who and how God had made me, they thought they knew, and they surely weren’t wrong. I had given people whom I trusted the power to speak into my life in the name of God and that was the result. They redirected my steps. They decided where I would go. Until the phone call that would be the last. Then they told my husband and me to go away. That is my favorite phone call of them all.

********
Shop at our Amazon store! As an Amazon Influencer, this website earns from qualifying purchases.

Regrets About Not Visiting Family

Recently at work a wave of sadness hit me. It started with reflections of a recent trip to West Virginia to visit my mom and dad; my dad mentioned something about taking a “real” vacation as in going to the Bahamas. I reminded him that with only 15 days vacation per year, I wanted to spend that time with family. That’s considerably less than 30 days leave when I served in the Navy. I split that time with my parents in West Virginia and my kids in Kansas as I presently live in Maryland.

In a way, one could say I am trying to atone for neglecting time with loved ones when I was in an abusive church. The founding pastor was very adamant about devoting time to “the ministry” – he even went so far as to say that if we spent more leave time at home than helping out at the church, something was wrong in our walk with God. He even claimed people backslide when they spent two or more weeks of leave visiting family.

As a faithful member, minister, and elder, I did my best to divide my time between church and family to “stay faithful.” My parents, however, didn’t like the fact I would be at the church over the Christmas and other major holidays, and wished I could have come home instead. This strained my relationship with my mom and dad, and it’s taken the entire time since I left to repair the damage.

For those who may not know, Steven Hassan wrote about this and other forms of controlling behavior by abusive churches. His BITE model (Behavior, Information, Thought, and Emotional Control) illustrated how this was designed to isolate people and make them easier to manipulate.

After learning about how I was led to believe the founder was a mighty man of God only to realize he was a criminal and scoundrel, I was devastated. I devoted so many years of my life and sacrificed even my relationship with my family, and for what? To be lied to? It’s a miracle of God I still believe in Him.

This is why I make more of an effort now to spend time with loved ones. We’re all getting older, and there’s no guarantee another opportunity will arise.

********
Shop at our Amazon store! As an Amazon Influencer, this website earns from qualifying purchases.

The Remnant Church Fallacy

Growing up in the Christian Church — Non Denominational, which is closely associated with the Disciples of Christ and Churches of Christ – Instrumental and Noninstrumental, I was taught that God has always had a “remnant,” that throughout the centuries there has always been at least a small group of people who were true believers, who believed exactly right. Others might have parts of the Truth, but they didn’t know everything.

In that church it wasn’t taught that anyone who didn’t believe what my church taught would be lost, just that we had to be careful what we believed with all of the teachings out there… and that our church was the one that could trace back through the centuries, whose beliefs had always been miraculously protected because there’d always been a remnant. It wasn’t emphasized there, but when I heard it again in the United Pentecostal Church, it made sense. Surely with all the various doctrines, there would be one church that had the WHOLE truth. And the United Pentecostal Church claimed to have just that. They even have a book about this called After the Way Called Heresy, and also claim that people who’ve upheld “the one true faith” have been martyred through the centuries but God always maintained his Church (meaning of course in their perspective Oneness Pentecostals). I treasured that book. I even did an independent study course in my secular college based on one of the martyrs listed in it.

Recently I’ve learned that Nondenominational Christian and United Pentecostal churches were not the only ones who make those claims. Independent Fundamental Baptist groups have similar claims, though using completely different groups throughout history to make their remnant claims. Of course, the Catholic Church does as well, though somewhat differently, claiming to have Peter, who received the keys to the kingdom, as their first pope, and believing that each pope since has been the head of the true church.

And so I googled. Seventh Day Adventists and Latter Day Saints both have their own remnant teachings. There are other groups that teach this as well. There are entire websites that talk about how only those in a “remnant church” will be saved, and then itemizing their own ideas of what the teachings of that “remnant” will consist of. Interestingly, the lists generally include lots of rules. What do none that I read through include? Surprisingly, faith in Jesus!

In both Revelation and Romans there are a few verses that mention a remnant of believers. But which believers? Are God’s people limited to a few buildings or a denomination, or is a remnant those who believe, no matter where they are or where they go? The passages in Romans and Revelations relate to the Israelite concept of remnants — in Romans 11, the surrounding text is about the 7000 that hadn’t “bowed their knee to Baal” in the story of Elijah. These were not 7000 that attended the same church. There is no mention of church at all. They were believers – believers Elijah didn’t even know about, apparently. It stands to reason that the remnant mentioned in the New Testament isn’t about a denomination, then, but about believers. Not people who believe in speaking in tongues or a certain mode of baptism or a certain Bible translation, but who believe in Jesus.

So yes, there will be a remnant. That remnant will not be found in a building or denomination. We do not need to hunt for a church that is part of the remnant. And we do not need to fear not being a part of it. Jesus’ followers are the remnant, no matter who or where they are.

********
Shop at our Amazon store! As an Amazon Influencer, this website earns from qualifying purchases.

IFB Churches: Patriarchy in Church Polity and Home (Part Two)

Relaxing in the over-sized chairs of the pastor’s office, each woman exhausted from an informative but draining week at missionary training camp, the pastor’s wife opens her Bible to 1 Corinthians 11:3. Her calming but authoritative voice fills the room, “But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.” (1 Corinthians 11:3 KJV). She pauses for a moment to pray before beginning her evening lesson: “God is the head of Christ. Christ is the head of man. Man is the head of the woman. Just as it would be wrong for a man to go around Christ to get to God, it would be wrong for a woman to go around her husband to get to God.” Despite adamant disagreement from her daughter, citing “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Tim 2:5), the pastor’s wife delivers a piercing glare and continues with prior-approval from her husband. “A wife should never speak poorly of her husband, not even to God. To do so would be to go around her husband.”

Back in the main classroom the following morning, the pastor continues his wife’s bizarre lesson by sharing that a wife should confess all her negative thoughts about her husband directly to her husband, and not to the Lord. He encourages the wives, as his wife does, to make lists during the day of all their thoughts to confess to their husbands when they return home from work. This method supposedly establishes accountability and transparency between a husband and wife, the husband also agreeing to confess his thoughts and any inappropriate sightings during the day. I can still feel the tightening pit in my stomach as I read the words across the laptop screen from my husband, “I want you to confess your thoughts to me.” Both of us attempting to please the Lord with the knowledge we recently gained, I agreed to my husband’s request until we later realized the gravity and gross overstepping of boundaries that evening.

While the Bible explicitly states that wives are to be in subjection to their own husbands as unto the Lord (Eph 5:22), and men are to love their wives as Christ loved the church and gave Himself for it (Eph 5:22), Independent Fundamental Baptist (IFB) churches tend to graze over the verse immediately before these commands, “submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God” (Eph 5:21). They completely ignore the concept of mutual submission, an idea that our IFB Bible college taught regularly despite the intense pastor-worship. Within the last year, my husband and I left an IFB church that overemphasized leadership and submission to the point that many of the women presented little to no personality of their own, while the men were exhorted to take their place in the ministry. Using methods directed towards man’s pride in providing for his family, and towards the woman’s emotional state in caring for her husband and children, husband-wife relationships quickly shifted out of balance.  Our pastor preached “The Leading Lady” multiple times, a message on four distinct methods women in the Bible used to lead their husbands.

“The Leading Lady”

“Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives; While they behold your chaste conversation coupled with fear. Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel; But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price. For after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection to their own husbands.” 1 Peter 3:1-5

After reading 1 Peter 3:1-5 (above), the pastor prefaces the message by providing the context of a believing wife with an unbelieving husband, the wife still in subjection to her husband (vs. 1). A saved wife will win her lost husband to Christ by her conversation- not limited to words, includes actions- and thus the lost wife should not preach at her husband because, “There’s something in a man that does not do well when he is told by a woman what to do.” While this may be the case, it assumes that only a man can righteously and justifiably resist the command of the opposite gender, while a woman resisting constitutes rebellion in her heart against authority and against God.

After continuing to encourage husbands and wives to establish the proper order of authority for the sake of their prayers not being hindered (vs. 7), he encourages men to help their wives “once in a blue moon.” He states, A woman gave herself to minister to you. Every once-in-a-while, get her drink. Instead of asking when she is going to put something away, go on ahead and place it where it belongs. The stark reality is that a large percentage of men in IFB churches expect their wives- and wives believe it to be their God-given purpose- to serve them hand-and-foot with houses cleaned, table set for dinner, children tidy and wives dolled-up before they arrive home from work, declaring such presentation “the least she can do.” Once a year, in a church we attended, the women would go through the fellowship line first for the sole purpose of serving their husbands first, before returning to the line to get food for themselves and for their children. This church also preaches from the pulpit that the husband should be served at the dinner table before the children. This does not represent a partnership or relationship ordained by God, but indeed an indentured servant-hood painted as a virtuous woman being a “help meet” [help-sufficient] for her husband. “A woman gave herself to minister to you”? The Biblical approach is the man and woman gave of themselves to minister to each other as one flesh.

Before getting to the main points, the gross misunderstanding of God’s design for marriage further protrudes with the idea that the woman does not need the man; the man needs the woman. “It is not good that man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him” (Gen 2:18). He concludes that when a wife passes away, her husband typically passes quickly thereafter, but when the roles are reversed and the husband passes away first, the wife “just keeps on going,” proving the woman only needs a man for his finances.  Such a declaration is not only preposterous but degrading to both men and women alike. Is a man’s value limited to his finances? Are women only able to attain in a relationship to the depth of financial need?  A woman, however, should be “thankful” that she is only scripturally required to submit “to her own husband,” not every man in the world. If a woman does not want to submit, however, she should not marry, and should consider the rebellion in her heart that is not of God. This mindset is not only unbalanced scripturally, but detrimental to God’s intentions and desires for marriage.

Alas, we finally arrive at the four ways women in the Bible indirectly lead their husbands without commanding them.

  1. The Persuasive Wife: Sarai (Genesis 16:1-6)
    In the Old Testament, Sarai is well-stricken with age and barren, impatiently waiting for the promise of a seed through her husband Abram. Instead of trusting God, she presses and persuades Abram to sleep with her handmaid, Hagar, that she may have seed through her. Because Abraham does not lead in refusing Sarai’s arguments, not only does Hagar conceive a son that would result in fighting and wars for centuries to come, but Sarai responds by blaming Abraham, “My wrong be upon thee” (vs. 5). Despite that it was Sarai’s plan, she tells Abraham “It is all your fault,” because the responsibility always comes back on the shoulders of the leadership.                                                                                                                              
  2. The Manipulative Wife: Rebekah (Genesis 27:1-13)
    Isaac, the son of Abraham, and his wife Rebekah have twin boys, Esau and Jacob, whom the Lord declared would be two nations (Gen 25:23). On the day set for Isaac to give Esau his blessing, as is custom for the firstborn son, Rebekah formulates a plan for Jacob to disguise himself as Esau, fooling her dim-eyed husband into giving Esau’s blessing to Jacob. With Jacob covered in goat’s skins and wearing his brother’s garments, Rebekah gives him savory meat to present to his father, and Isaac blesses Jacob before he dies. “Things were not working out how [Rebekah] wants them to. Isaac thinks he is leading, but Rebekah KNOWS she is leading.” Are the husbands the ones leading in their homes? “If you have to look over to your wife for approval, you are not the one leading.” Wives are admonished to never manipulate their husbands while husbands are exhorted to make sure they are not being manipulated in their own homes.                                                                                                                                                                                            
  3. The Emotional Wife: Samson’s Wife (Judges 14)
    After Samson finds a daughter of the Philistines to wife and presents the Philistines with an impossible riddle, the Philistines threaten Samson’s wife for the answer. Instead of telling Samson about the threats, the woman accuses Samson of hating her and not loving her, weeping before him for seven days until he finally gives her the answer to the riddle. The tears of a woman will knock a large percentage of men on their knees, and she used her tears to lead him. “Quit using your emotions to lead your home.”                                                                                                                                                                                              
  4. The Mothering Wife: Jezebel (1 Kings 21)
    Because Naboth refuses to give Ahab his vineyard, Ahab throws a temper tantrum in front of his wife, Jezebel, refusing to eat and turning himself away from her on his bed. Jezebel is the mom: Ahab is the child. Jezebel turns to him and say, “Does thou now govern the kingdom of Israel? I will give thee the vineyard of Naboth the Nezreelite (1 Kings 21:7). Mama will take care of it for you.” Jezebel proceeds to write letters in her husband’s name, has Naboth killed, and then says, “Go enjoy your vineyard.” Women often complain about a husband who will not grow up and be a man. “Then stop mothering your husband. Stop telling him what to do, how to do it, when to do it, creating an environment where he is dependent upon you. He is not going to become a man as long as you are doing that.” Women are encouraged to step out of the way so their husbands can lead.

Ironically, one of the statements we heard often in our IFB Bible college is, “The reason a counterfeit is dangerous is because it is so close to the truth.” The examples of women indirectly leading their husbands contain truth, but they are severely imbalanced, twisted to instill distrust between a husband and wife, placing the burden on the woman to never express more than a gentle opinion or disagreement, and to step back, allowing her husband to make every decision in the home. In my own marriage, as an emotional woman, I felt like I had to hide my tears and my emotions from my husband in order to not lead him, even in situations that caused great heartache. It set my husband on edge as he felt that he had to make sure he was not being led indirectly in every facet of life. Any balance we previously found in marriage became a battle of leading verses submission because he needed to make sure he was not being mothered, and I needed to suppress any emotions during conversations.

The pastor concludes by admonishing the congregation through fear to remember that there are other subtle ways to lead without commanding. “You’re hindering your husband by not fulfilling your God-called roll in your home…At the judgement seat of Christ, is there is going to be some reckoning for how we led our homes. Get out of the way and let him grow into what God wants him to be, or else you’re leading.” He warns that boys raised in a woman-led home become effeminate, lacking influence of males like they need. Because of this, they will deal with everything emotionally and will be become effeminate men like we have today. “It’s because a generation has been raised by women.” He encourages the men to be gentle, but leaders. For the women, he rebukes, “Ladies, step out of the way. Don’t use your emotions. Don’t command him. If you have a problem, take it right to God – the one place you can take it- and it will mend many things broken in your home.”

Since when is prayer the only place a woman should take her complaint, rather to than her husband? Since when should a woman not express her opinion, particularly in an area of importance? Do some women attempt to manipulate their husbands? Yes. Do some women mother their husbands? Yes. But the solution is not for a woman to cower in the silence and bondage of extreme submission, while her husband is magnified on a pedestal of honor, lest they accidentally lead their husbands and destroy their homes. God never intended for women to be the stepping stones to a man’s glory. He gave women their own intellects, minds to be able to formulate individual opinions and decisions, not simply to take care of the home, but for men and women to support each other through life. If I can help it, I will never be in another church that teaches such extreme views on submission again because of its destructive power in the home.

*Disclaimer* This series, “Why Am I a Baptist?” is NOT an exhaustive list of IFB doctrine and standards. Because of the autonomous nature of IFB churches, this evaluation is of the movement as a whole, rather than a hard-and-fast rule. It may be possible to find healthy IFB churches, but they are few and far between because of various associations known as “camps,” typically surrounding well-known preachers or preference of worship style.

Why Am I a Baptist?
IFB Doctrine: The Baptist Distinctives
IFB Churches: Patriarchy in Church Polity (Part One)
IFB Churches: Patriarchy and the Leading Lady (Part Two)
IFB Churches: Patriarchy in Marriage (Part Three)
IFB Churches: Patriarchy and Keeping at Home (Part Four)
IFB Churches: Patriarchy and Sexual Obedience (Part Five)
IFB Churches: Patriarchy and Domestic Abuse (Part Six)
IFB Standards: Rigid Music and Dress Standards (Part One)

********
Shop at our Amazon store! As an Amazon Influencer, this website earns from qualifying purchases.

Click to access the login or register cheese
YouTube
YouTube
Set Youtube Channel ID
BLUESKY
Protected By
Shield Security PRO