United Pentecostal Minister Don Martin & David Reever’s License Endorsement

Don Giovanni Martin 2021
Don Giovanni Martin 2021

This is the second installment of my coverage on former United Pentecostal Church minister, Don Giovanni “Donnie” Martin. Read part one here. He plead guilty on October 28, 2021 to the second degree rape of a minor, a felony. He was sentenced to twenty years in prison, with 18 of them suspended and he must serve five years of supervised probation. He is currently serving his time at the Baltimore City Correctional Center, a minimum security level facility in Baltimore. This is case number C-03-CR-21-002614. You may read some of the court documents in PDF format here.

I am going to share some details of the licensing process and UPCI rules. This case will give you insight into UPCI pastors wrongfully endorsing people for license, as well as what can happen in their judicial procedure. I am not going to jump right into the judicial procedure as there are important aspects of this case that need to be understood. Some may consider this to be tedious or unnecessary, but it is crucial in understanding the egregious nature of what occurred.

2017 Purpose Institute Graduation
2017 Purpose Institute Graduation

On May 18, 2017, Don Martin graduated from the Purpose Institute that was conducted at Abundant Life Church. The church held a ceremony for the four graduates. Purpose Institute is not a college, nor is it accredited. It is a “ministry training institution that partners with local Apostolic trainers” and “enables trainers to develop leader’s ministry skills and to clarify their individual purpose.”

The UPCI has three levels of licensing: local, general and ordained. Many start with a local license, though those who have attended one of the Bible colleges may start with a general. In order to apply for a local license, the applicant must be at least 17 and complete the mandatory requirements set by the organization, of which I will only point out that one includes preaching an average of once a week for six months and another is that the UPCI Manual must be read. They will then meet with the District Board of their state, where they will be examined.

They are expected to “labor in cooperation with, and under the supervision of, their local UPCI pastor until they enter ministerial responsibilities that remove them from their local assembly.” Additionally, a minister holding local license is not permitted to conduct marriages unless they are a pastor or have been authorized by their pastor to do so.

Don Martin applied for, and was granted, a local license in 2019. For this case, there are three important aspects of the application.

UPCI Local License Application Page 5
UPCI Local License Application Page 5

On page five, question 38 asks, “Have you ever been convicted of or pleaded guilty to child abuse or a crime involving actual or attempted sexual molestation of a minor? If yes, please explain.” First, no explanation should be needed if the response is ‘yes’ as such should prohibit them from being licensed. That should be an instant denial.

Second, because Martin had not yet been arrested or convicted for his crimes, he could respond to this with ‘no’ and not be lying. The UPCI needs to add to this question, if they have ever been accused of those things and/or ever committed those acts, but was never accused or charged. Had this been added, Martin would have had to answer ‘yes’ and explain what happened…or lie, and answer otherwise.

UPCI Local License Application Page 6
UPCI Local License Application Page 6

On page six, two questions are asked which pertain to the reading of the Manual. One asks, “Have you read the Articles of Faith and do you agree with them?” The next asks, “Have you read the ministerial obligations and rules and do you agree with them?” Keep in mind that Don Martin had to read the Manual before obtaining license. Later in this article you will see what he read, which should have shown him that he was not eligible to be licensed or to even preach in a UPCI church.

UPCI Local License Application Page 7
UPCI Local License Application Page 7

On the final page of the application, you will see where the pastor, or another ordained UPCI minister, must sign. Applicants need to have the recommendation of their local pastor. That brings us to the inexcusable actions of Martin’s pastor, David Reever, in endorsing him for his license. He clearly violated United Pentecostal Church policy in doing so.

You will recall from the first article, that in 2003 David Reever and two other UPC ministers met with Don Martin as he wanted to return to Abundant Life Church. Reever was not the pastor when Martin raped the victim in 1990, but had been the pastor since 1997. Don Martin admitted at the 2003 meeting to ‘having sex with’ the victim and claimed that she was attractive and came on to him.

When Reever was interviewed by police in 2021, when they were investigating the crime, he remembered who the victim was and shared that Martin admitted to having sex with her when she was a minor. Knowing this, Reever STILL signed Martin’s license application and apparently did not inform the Maryland-Washington DC District Board about his knowledge of Martin’s past. If he did, that makes this extremely more troublesome. In addition, in 2019 when the license was approved, Reever was the District Secretary and most likely was present when the Board met with Martin and voted to approve his license.

David Reever
David Reever

Why is this inexcusable? No matter how David Reever viewed what happened, even if he saw it as Martin described, with the 11 year old coming on to him, he should not have endorsed Martin. A minor, especially not one so young, can never consent to intercourse with an adult. If Reever viewed this as repented of and forgiven because Martin confessed in the 2003 meeting, he still should not have endorsed him. A person is disqualified from holding license in the UPCI if they have committed sexual abuse. This was not an affair, nor adultery, nor consensual intercourse- it was the rape of a minor.

David Reever obtained his UPCI license sometime after 1980 and before 1986. (I do not have a complete set of Directories from the 1980s.) The 1981 UPCI Manual, even back then, clearly stated that, “For the purpose of ministerial membership in the United Pentecostal Church International or for ministering in a United Pentecostal International church, immoral conduct shall be defined as: adultery, fornication, homosexuality, incest, and/or any other sexual acts determined by the District Board to be perverted or immoral.”

The 2019 Manual, which was released that January, stated the same and was in effect when Don Martin was granted his license.

Remember that one of the requirements of obtaining license is that the applicant must preach an average of once a week for six months. It is not unreasonable to assume that David Reever would have allowed Don Martin to preach at times before obtaining his license, in order for him to meet this requirement. That would be despite the clear mention in the Manual that said, “or for ministering in a United Pentecostal International church.”

The 2019 Manual continues saying, “Any minister affiliated with our organization proven guilty of adultery or fornication, or committing any other immoral offense, shall forfeit his or her papers immediately. Immoral offense shall include sexual molestation of minors.

“In the event a minister confesses in writing to immoral conduct and surrenders his or her fellowship card, no trial shall be granted. In either case, such minister shall never be qualified for reinstatement into the ministry of the United Pentecostal Church International.” Note that the sexual molestation of minors was specifically mentioned.

While the Manual does not specifically state that this applies to those seeking licensing, it should be clear that Martin’s actions and prior confession would have permanently disqualified him from obtaining one. You will later see that this is true.

I am attaching the entire local license application in PDF form. I have previously written an article on the United Pentecostal Church Rules Regarding Sexual Immorality & Ministers as well as a six part series with information on licensing in the United Pentecostal Church and the rules for ministers.

The June 23, 2021 video below is UPCI minister Scott Graham, describing the local license application.

You will find a complete list of articles in this series by clicking here.

********
Shop at our Amazon store! As an Amazon Influencer, this website earns from qualifying purchases.

Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 3

Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith: Fundamental Doctrine. Comparing 1952 to 2022.

The United Pentecostal Church formed in 1945. Here we will briefly examine what the Articles of Faith have stated about their fundamental doctrine.

1952 Articles of Faith Fundamental Doctrine
1952 Articles of Faith Fundamental Doctrine

What many current UPCI members do not realize, is that some of the people who came together to form the organization, believed that a person was saved upon repentance, but should go on to be water baptized in the name of Jesus and speak in tongues. Today you would likely not hear such a teaching in a UPCI church. David Bernard, the current General Superintendent, has downplayed the fact that the two groups had differences in beliefs.

This difference is why there is a mention in the fundamental doctrine concerning not contending for one’s individual beliefs. Due to the original wording, two groups were able to agree to come together and not cause division over when a person was considered saved.

Stanley Chambers (the first General Secretary of the United Pentecostal Church, who later became the General Superintendent in 1967), stated in an article published in the Pentecostal Herald (Official UPC Publication), that when the two groups merged to form the UPC, “one of the greatest problems for them to consider was the Fundamental Doctrine.” He shared there was “much discussion” about it.

Final Pentecostal Outlook 1945
Final Pentecostal Outlook 1945

In the October 1945 edition of the Pentecostal Outlook, the official publication of the P.A.J.C., W.T. Witherspoon wrote, “Prior to the coming together of all the delegates of both organizations, your Board of Presbyters had three or four sessions with the general board of the P.C.I. There were a number of major points which they wished to discuss. There were times when we diametrically disagreed as we presented our views based on what we thought you would want. A sweet spirit of unity and forbearance swept away each disagreement as we met each other half way.”

First Pentecostal Herald 1945
First Pentecostal Herald 1945

In the very first edition of The Pentecostal Herald after the merger, Oscar Vouga wrote, “The two former conferences agreed to make this paper open for articles pertaining to truths that may or may not be the opinion of all brethren, so long as these articles do not conflict with the Fundamentals of Faith of the United Pentecostal Church. …

“Articles on subjects such as ‘The New Birth,’ will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. This is indeed the most proper attitude toward the most vital subject, as we are all seeking after truth, and are confident that God will lead us into all truth, by His Spirit.”

How things have changed in the United Pentecostal Church since their inception!

In the original form of the fundamental doctrine, when it speaks of water baptism, the words “for the remission of sins” were not added until 1973, almost 30 years after the formation of the organization. Some claimed that the words were left out of the original 1945 statement as “an oversight.”

Others, like W.M. Greer and L.H. Hardwick, stated that those words had been deliberately left out and if they had been included in 1945, there would have been no merger.

When the resolution to add “for the remission of sins” was presented in 1973, Greer agreed to second the motion for acceptance as long as there was no official interpretation of the word ‘for’ in the phrase “for the remission of sins.” The word can be understood to mean “because of” or “in order to obtain.”

In Christianity Without the Cross, on page 338, Thomas Fudge shares that Greer failed to “stand up for the merger agreement” and in doing so, he and others “sacrificed, perhaps unwittingly, the binding principles of the merger itself for the sake of peace, political expediency and their own current welfare. … There can be no gainsaying that Greer acted honorably on behalf of unity, but he committed a serious tactical error which could neither be compensated nor reversed. On 23 October 1973 the PCI theological tradition crossed its Rubicon and W.M. Greer unwittingly led the last charge into doctrinal obscurity. That last flight had profound implications. That action had the resulting effect of eliminating whatever residual moorings the UPC might still have retained soteriologically in mainstream Christianity.”

2022 Articles of Faith Fundamental Doctrine
2022 Articles of Faith Fundamental Doctrine

On page 154 of Thomas Fudge’s book, Christianity Without the Cross, he mentions that there was a resolution proposed at one time to remove the word “full” from the term “full salvation” in the fundamental doctrine statement. On page 186 he mentions how there was a submission to the resolution committee to add the words, “and a life of Holiness according to the pattern and example given in the Word of God and described in the Articles of Faith of the UPCI” to the fundamental doctrine as part of the plan of salvation. These resolutions never passed.

To read the entire 1952 UPCI Articles of Faith, go here.

Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 1: Public School Activities
Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 2: Holiness
Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 3: Fundamental Doctrine
Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 4: Atonement
Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 5: Conscientious Scruples

********
Shop at our Amazon store! As an Amazon Influencer, this website earns from qualifying purchases.

Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 2

Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith: Holiness. Comparing 1952 to 2022.

1952 Articles of Faith Holiness Section
1952 Articles of Faith Holiness Section

The United Pentecostal Church formed in 1945. Over the years they have increasingly added rules. Here we will examine what the Articles of Faith have stated about holiness.

Please note the added changes between 1952 and the current year. Back then there was one sentence followed by four scripture quotes. While the same passages are quoted today, a whole list of disapproved practices follow.

1954 resolution to add to Articles of Faith
1954 resolution to add to Articles of Faith

It was in 1954 that a resolution was considered and passed at General Conference to add the last paragraph to the holiness section. It was prompted by how television had been pervading our society.

The addition first appears in the 1955 Manual, with the exception of “or swimming” after mixed bathing, as we see in the present version. Somewhere between 1994 and 2002 those two words were added. (I have the 1994 and 2002 Manuals, but not those in between.)

December 1954 Pentecostal Herald hair tract
December 1954 Pentecostal Herald hair tract

In the October 1954 edition of The Pentecostal Herald (the UPCI’s official publication), they featured a 4 and a half page article about not cutting a woman’s hair. The Hair Question was written by Murray E. Burr. By the end of the year they had released the article in tract form.

It is interesting to note, for as much as they harp on women wearing pants, this was never specifically mentioned in the Articles of Faith. In addition, though many today believe that the UPCI has dropped their stand against television, it is still spoken against here.

2022 Articles of Faith Holiness
2022 Articles of Faith Holiness

To read the entire 1952 UPCI Articles of Faith, go here.

Position Papers referred to: Media Technology
Gender Distinction
Holiness

Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 1: Public School Activities
Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 2: Holiness
Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 3: Fundamental Doctrine
Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 4: Atonement
Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 5: Conscientious Scruples

********
Shop at our Amazon store! As an Amazon Influencer, this website earns from qualifying purchases.

United Pentecostal Minister Don Martin Second Degree Rape of a Minor

Don Giovanni Martin 2021
Don Giovanni Martin 2021

This past Tuesday, June 21, 2022, was a year ago that United Pentecostal minister Don Giovanni “Donnie” Martin was arrested and charged with second-degree rape, second-degree sex offense and second-degree assault of an 11 year old girl in 1990. Martin would have been 25 at the time of his crime and was married. Pay attention to dates, as these will be important in what I will share in a subsequent post. This is case number C-03-CR-21-002614. You may read some of the court documents in PDF format here.

The assault happened at Martin’s apartment during a youth group sleepover at which his wife was also present. Martin was a youth pastor at Abundant Life Church, previously the Dundalk United Pentecostal Church, and lived on Havenwood Road in Baltimore County.

Martin had been known to flirt with girls in the youth group, including the victim. While the others were asleep, Martin and the victim went out on the balcony where he kissed her, pulled her pants down and penetrated her from behind.

The day after the rape, the girl told her sister and mother. It was reported to the pastor, Chris Tharp, who set up a meeting with the victim and Don Martin. Martin’s wife was also present. Martin denied the accusation and his wife is said to have yelled at the victim. After this, the Martin family left the church and went to Christian Revival Center in Reisterstown, where Charles Curry was, and still is, pastor. Meanwhile, in late 1997, David Reever became pastor of Abundant Life.

In 2003, Don Martin wanted to return to Abundant Life Church due to something that happened at the other church, so a meeting was held where Don Martin and David M. Reever were present, along with two other UPC ministers who worked with Reever, Raymond Almsteadt and Andrew Smith. In that meeting, Don Martin admitted to ‘having sex with’ the victim and claimed that she was attractive and came on to him.

When Andrew Smith was interviewed by police in 2021, he recalled the meeting and shared that Don Martin admitted that he was unfaithful to his wife and that it may have involved a minor. When Reever was interviewed by police the same year, he remembered who the victim was and shared that Martin admitted to having sex with her when she was a minor.

Ray Almsteadt shared that he spoke to David Reever in an attempt to prevent Martin from returning to the church, but he was told by Reever that he had unforgiveness in his heart and needed to forgive Martin.

Don G. Martin 2021 criminal charges
Don G. Martin 2021 criminal charges

Martin, born March 26, 1965, originally had five charges against him, but in a plea agreement on October 28, 2021, he plead guilty to second degree rape, a felony, and the other charges were dropped. He was sentenced to twenty years in prison, with 18 of them suspended, and he was ordered to serve five years of supervised probation. Unfortunately, he was not required to register as a sex offender due to how long ago the crime occurred.

On November 29, 2021,  a petition for modification of Martin’s sentence was filed by him and on December 22, 2021 it was denied by the court. He is currently serving his time at the Baltimore City Correctional Center, a minimum security level facility in Baltimore.

Church members in court hallway
Church members in court hallway

One man shared on social media that he was shocked to show up at court and see church members who arrived to support Martin, including David and Christina Reever. The authorities were also shocked that so many showed up for the sentencing of a rapist. How is this consistent with the 2019 UPCI position paper which calls for its ministers and churches to prioritize care for the victim? (“The UPCI charges our ministers and our institutions to create a culture in which victims can safely share instances of abuse and receive necessary care and protection throughout the process.”)

This is not the first time I have heard of this happening, where church members and/or ministers attend court proceedings in support of a perpetrator, instead of the victim(s).

The man wrote, “This came out 30 years later because the perpetrator was given a license to pastor even though his endorsing pastor was aware of the abuse that happened. When the victim confronted the endorsing pastor he dismissed her feelings and said ‘I hope you find healing.'”

David Reever 2021 District Superintendent
David Reever April 2021 District Superintendent

The endorsing pastor mentioned is David Reever, the current Superintendent of the Maryland-Washington DC District of the UPCI, having been elected in April of 2021. He has been the pastor of Abundant Life Church, an affiliated UPCI church, for more than two decades.

It is important to note that when an individual applies for a UPC license, the pastor must endorse them and sign their application. This is what David Reever did, after the 2003 meeting mentioned above. Let that sink in. This clearly goes against the rules outlined in the UPCI Manual. Martin never should have even been considered for a license as his crimes forever banned him from obtaining one, as well as being forbidden to ever preach in one of their churches.

Don Martin first appears in the 2020 UPCI Directory, indicating that he received his license in 2019, as the Directories are issued every January. Chester Wright was the District Superintendent then, with Reever the District Secretary. It is extremely important to note that this license was granted after at least four UPC ministers had been made aware of his crimes. There was also at least one other alleged assault of which I am aware, that happened after this victim, but she was not a minor. Martin was asked to resign his license in 2021, which he did.

The crime was reported to police in early 2021, after the victim learned that David Reever permitted Don Martin to preach at Abundant Life. She first reached out to Reever, asking why he was allowed to have influence, as Martin had returned to the church and later became licensed. As shared above, Reever’s response to her was, “I hope you find healing.” When interviewed by police, Reever stated that he allowed Don Martin to preach there because he didn’t have access to children. This is untrue and has been confirmed by more than one individual.

After this was reported to police, they suspected there could be more victims (like in the ongoing Scott and Travis Huse cases in Wisconsin). It is well known that a pedophile does not abuse just one person. In all the years which have passed, there could be many survivors out there and if so, we hope they will come forward. Maryland has no criminal statute of limitations on child sexual abuse. Baltimore Police can still be contacted at 410-307-2020 if you were a victim, or know of a victim. Callers may remain anonymous.

I previously wrote an article on the United Pentecostal Church Rules Regarding Sexual Immorality & Ministers as well as a six part series with information on licensing in the United Pentecostal Church and the rules for ministers.

You will find a complete list of articles in this series by clicking here.

********
Shop at our Amazon store! As an Amazon Influencer, this website earns from qualifying purchases.

Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 1

Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith- Public School Activities. Comparing 1952 to 2022.

1952 Articles of Faith Public School Activities
1952 Articles of Faith Public School Activities

The United Pentecostal Church formed in 1945. Over the years they have increasingly added rules. Here we will examine what the Articles of Faith have stated about public school activities.

Please note all the added changes between 1952 and the current year. This section was not included in the initial UPCI Manual. It first appeared in 1948. In 1952 this section contained one sentence. Since then, four more have been added.

They remained as written in the 1952 version through 1981. In 1982, the second paragraph had been added and it stayed like this through the 1989 Manual. The next two paragraphs were added in the 1990 Manual and it has not changed since then.

2022 Articles of Faith Public School Activities
2022 Articles of Faith Public School Activities

To read the entire 1952 UPCI Articles of Faith, go here.

Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 1: Public School Activities
Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 2: Holiness
Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 3: Fundamental Doctrine
Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 4: Atonement
Then & Now: Changes to the United Pentecostal Articles of Faith Part 5: Conscientious Scruples

********
Shop at our Amazon store! As an Amazon Influencer, this website earns from qualifying purchases.

Click to access the login or register cheese
YouTube
YouTube
Set Youtube Channel ID
x  Powerful Protection for WordPress, from Shield Security
This Site Is Protected By
ShieldPRO